As a child, I stumbled into the world of physics research as a passionate amateur. I wrote a clumsy first article that I tried to publish, but I still need to do so. Just as clumsily, I published it as a preprint at the suggestion of the publisher MDPI to make it known. But it was mainly the predators who were interested in it, without success, because in another life I was a specialist, among other things, in computer security.

As a child, I learned from my mistakes and grew.

This time, I found a remarkable and indisputable fact in the demonstration of Planck’s law. So, I took it again in a new paradigm, and I will try to publish a new, innovative version of this demonstration. There will be no preprint.

For the moment, I have only tested it by submitting the title and abstract to the Wiley Journal finder. The result: Strong! I am proposing to submit it to the journal Advanced Materials. That doesn’t assume anything, but it is encouraging. Either way, I’m taking my time to think about this step before I start.

These questions that concern me:

The enigma of the formula “E=hν”:

How can an energy, equivalent to a kinetic energy during its instantaneous encounter with an electron, be proportional to a frequency measured over a second?

How can we explain the coincidence that the value of “h,” if we take it as energy in joules, whatever the frequency, corresponds to the energy of a cycle?

How can we not see that in both forms of Planck’s law, we have a remarkable element “λ^-2” in front of the system unit “m^-2”?

…